Which statement is true about Congress and the Supreme Court's jurisdiction?

Study for the ALA Civil Procedure and Constitutional Law Exam. Engage with challenging multiple choice questions, each with explanations. Prepare effectively for your exam today!

Multiple Choice

Which statement is true about Congress and the Supreme Court's jurisdiction?

Explanation:
Congress can regulate only the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction, not its original jurisdiction. Article III vests original jurisdiction for a very limited set of cases (such as those affecting ambassadors, and cases where a state is a party) in the Supreme Court. For all other cases, the Court has appellate jurisdiction, and Congress may shape that appellate jurisdiction by statute—including adding exceptions and regulations. So Congress cannot enlarge or create new original jurisdiction beyond what the Constitution enumerates, but it can govern the path of appeals to the Court. Asking the Court to hear tax cases as a general rule would intrude on the Court’s discretionary docket and go beyond Congress’s constitutional authority over appellate jurisdiction.

Congress can regulate only the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction, not its original jurisdiction. Article III vests original jurisdiction for a very limited set of cases (such as those affecting ambassadors, and cases where a state is a party) in the Supreme Court. For all other cases, the Court has appellate jurisdiction, and Congress may shape that appellate jurisdiction by statute—including adding exceptions and regulations. So Congress cannot enlarge or create new original jurisdiction beyond what the Constitution enumerates, but it can govern the path of appeals to the Court. Asking the Court to hear tax cases as a general rule would intrude on the Court’s discretionary docket and go beyond Congress’s constitutional authority over appellate jurisdiction.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy